Editorial Type: ORIGINAL RESEARCH
 | 
Online Publication Date: 17 Mar 2025

Health Care Professionals’ Promotion of Exercise Referral Schemes in New South Wales

MSc, ESSAM AEP,
PhD, ESSAM AEP,
PhD, and
PhD, ESSAM AEP
Article Category: Research Article
Page Range: 2 – 9
DOI: 10.31189/2165-6193-14.1.2
Save
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

Background

Exercise referral schemes (ERSs) can increase physical activity participation and improve health outcomes associated with chronic disease. The success of these programs relies heavily on the active involvement of health care professionals to make referrals. In this study, we explore the barriers and facilitators that influence health care professionals’ promotion of physical activity and ERSs in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.

Methods

Participants were recruited through Live Life Get Active, an existing, free ERS and health promotion charity. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 8 health care professionals. Data were analyzed using deductive and exploratory thematic analysis.

Results

Participants described their attitudes toward physical activity promotion via ERSs and barriers and facilitators to recommending physical activity programs. All participants described the importance of tailoring physical activity recommendations to their patients’ health needs, lifestyles, and preferences. While participants understood the value of ERSs, they faced consultation time constraints, limited awareness of available programs, and the need to prioritize alternative treatments for health conditions. However, participants reported their own and patients’ positive experiences with physical activity, good physical activity literacy, and a clear understanding of the potential advantages for patients were catalysts for referrals. A streamlined referral process to free programs with social components was preferred.

Conclusion

Identified barriers to health care professionals promoting ERSs highlight the need for increased knowledge of available ERSs and physical activity programs and improved referral pathways. The findings support a focus on increasing professionals’ knowledge about exercise and reducing the gap between knowledge and action by increasing ease of exercise referral.

INTRODUCTION

Chronic diseases are a major social and economic burden across the world (1). Globally, physical inactivity costs an estimated 67.5 billion international dollars to health care systems per year (2). In Australia, 47% of Australians had 1 or more chronic condition in 2017–2018, with 89% of deaths related to chronic disease (1). Physical activity interventions can be effective in reducing the burden of chronic disease and be cost effective based on economic evaluation (3). Exercise is one type of physical activity that is planned, structured, and repetitive (4). It is recommended that adults participate in 150–300 minutes of aerobic activity per week and 2 muscle strengthening sessions; however, 85% of Australians do not meet these guidelines (5).

In Australia, people with chronic and/or complex health conditions are eligible for subsidized allied health consults such as exercise physiology, through government-funded Medicare, upon receiving referral from their general practitioner (GP) (6). However, the cost of these sessions is not fully covered and is limited to 5 per year (6). Exercise referral schemes (ERSs) specifically aim to increase physical activity and may augment routine care to improve patient outcomes (7). All health care professionals have a role to play in promoting physical activity participation (8); however, referrals to accredited exercise physiologists are ad hoc, and ERSs are underused in Australia (9,10).

Australia is one of a few countries to embed exercise professionals (EPs) into a government-funded health care system (11). However, current referral rates to ERSs are very low Australia wide (estimated at less than 5% of those eligible) (9). GPs are usually the first point of contact in the health system, with 85% of Australians attending a GP appointment at least once per year (12,13). Due to this reach, GPs are well placed to have significant influence on their patients’ perceptions and use of exercise services for chronic disease management (12,13).

Physical activity promotion is a cost-effective way to increase physical activity levels (1416). ERSs can promote physical activity through social prescribing, an approach gaining increasing recognition, which involves GPs or other health professionals recommending a range of nonclinical services available in the community (17,18). Referral schemes can increase physical activity levels and improve health outcomes in those with chronic conditions (19). Physical activity promotion in primary care has been well explored in a variety of contexts (2023). Live Life Get Active (LLGA) is an Australian health promotion charity providing free outdoor exercise sessions in over 100 communities across Australia, largely at locations around the eastern seaboard of NSW. Members can be referred by a health professional for chronic condition management or self-refer. LLGA classes have high acceptability due to enjoyment, accessibility, class variety, and social support (24). Awareness and relevance of ERSs like LLGA can be increased through promotion by health professionals, potentially increasing participation in exercise for those with chronic and/or complex health conditions.

While health care professionals can promote or directly encourage use of ERSs to potentially improve patient outcomes, such programs remain largely underused. Programs often have components such as individualized, patient-centered approaches, involving behavior change techniques and education alongside physical activity (25). Features of ERSs associated with increased uptake, effectiveness, and adherence include face-to-face consultations and telephone calls, quality service provided by EPs, and programs that elicit social, mental, and physical health benefits (26,27). However, research in which authors have ascertained why health care professionals choose to refer to such schemes is lacking. Such information is critical to inform the design, promotion, and uptake of ERSs.

The aim of this study was to understand the barriers and facilitators for health professionals to promoting ERSs, focusing on the views of multidisciplinary health care professionals and including professionals who actively promote ERSs and those who do not. These findings in the Australian context were then used to offer recommendations applicable for other contexts.

METHODS

Ethics approval was granted by The University of New South Wales (UNSW) Human Research Ethics Committee prior to recruitment (HC220381).

Study Design

The reporting of this study was guided by the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) (28). The full SRQR checklist can be found in the Supplementary Materials. Qualitative, descriptive methodology was used (29), informed by a pragmatic research paradigm (30).

Participants and Recruitment

Participants were recruited through LLGA by sending out a study invitation via e-mail to health care professionals who have referred to LLGA and health care professionals who have not referred to LLGA but have publicly available contact information. This invitation included a link for potential participants to register their interest in being contacted about the study.

Inclusion criteria for participants taking part in this study were

  • (a)

    aged 18 years or older;

  • (b)

    health care professional working clinically in NSW, the state where the most (66%) LLGA camps are located; and

  • (c)

    working as a GP, GP registrar, allied health professional, secondary health professional, or nurse.

Data Collection

Participants were first given the choice to provide written or verbal informed consent. After providing written or verbal consent, each participant took part in a 15–20-minute one-on-one, semistructured video call interview with investigators (CM and GM). Questions related to the barriers and facilitators to promoting ERSs (see Supplementary Materials). Interviews were transcribed verbatim through auto-captions that were also manually checked for accuracy. Identifiable information was then removed. Transcripts were uploaded to NVivo12 qualitative analysis software (QSR International, Melbourne, Australia) for analysis. Data collection was finalized based on information power, whereby the richness and relevance of data collected from participants were considered adequate based on the study aim (31,32).

Data Analysis

The lead researcher (CM) read transcripts multiple times to become familiar with the data before identifying and generating codes for data. Next, codes were used to create recurring themes and subthemes. The final stage of reflective thematic analysis was reviewing and revising themes based on research team critical discussions (33,34). Deductive thematic analysis was used, with the authors asking specifically about barriers and facilitators with the preconceived intent to classify themes as either a barrier or facilitator (33). However, exploratory thematic analysis was also used because themes were developed based on the perspectives of participants, rather than the authors’ perceptions (33).

Reflexivity

GM and CR are female researchers with expertise in conducting qualitative research related to physical activity and mental health. As accredited exercise physiologists, CM and GM acknowledge the role their clinical experience and training as health care professionals and working with interdisciplinary health professionals had in the interpretation of data.

RESULTS

Participant Characteristics

Recruitment took place between December 2022 and May 2023. Thirteen potential participants expressed interest in the study, and 8 participated in an interview, with the remaining lost to contact and not providing reasons for opting out of an interview. The sample comprised 3 GPs, 3 clinical psychologists, and 2 allied health professionals (1 physiotherapist and 1 accredited exercise physiologist) practicing in NSW, Australia. Further participant demographic information is presented in Table 1. The mean age was 36 years old with ages ranging from 23 to 57 and comprised 75% females.

TABLE 1.Health professional participant characteristics.
TABLE 1.

Thematic Structure

Attitudes of health care professionals toward physical activity were to tailor physical activity and exercise approaches in collaboration with each patient, based on their health, lifestyle, and individual preferences. Participants discussed 3 barriers and 3 facilitators to promoting ERSs as displayed in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1.FIGURE 1.FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.Thematic analysis structure dichotomized into health care professional barriers and facilitators to promoting exercise referral schemes (ERSs).

Citation: Journal of Clinical Exercise Physiology 14, 1; 10.31189/2165-6193-14.1.2

Tailored Physical Activity and Exercise Approach Determined in Collaboration With Patients

All participants emphasized a positive attitude toward tailoring physical activity for patient health, needs, and intrapersonal barriers. Tailoring was believed to be best practice when providing physical activity and exercise advice.

“They can barely make the appointments with us, let alone join a gym, so I just try to adapt it based on what is in their capacity” (P2, 39-year-old female, GP).

This approach is reported to be determined in collaboration with the patient and often involves a multistage process and behavioral change techniques such as motivational interviewing:

“You identify what their values are, and if being healthy is important to them, but they’ve neglected it, then you keep chipping away, and you plant that seed, and then when you help them realize that being healthy is something important to them, then what’s some steps they can take to move towards that?” (P1, 39-year-old male, clinical psychologist).

“I think, to be a good doctor, you need to think of the whole patient and not just medications. It’s also their mental health and their lifestyle” (P8, 38-year-old female, GP).

Some health professionals acknowledged that, sometimes, logistics relating to a patient’s personal situation is the most important factor, rather than the type of physical activity program on offer:

“It’s how it can be fit into their current circumstances and commitments” (P3, 26-year-old female, clinical psychologist).

“I ask the patient what they’re likely to engage in. There’s not much point telling them to do something that they’re unlikely to want to do or if it’s not accessible for them” (P6, 57-year-old female, GP).

Barriers to Recommending Physical Activity and ERSs

Limited consult duration inhibited ability to recommend physical activity and provide exercise referrals. GPs highlighted that their short appointments with patients leave little time for thorough physical activity education and/or referral. This barrier for GPs was also acknowledged by other health care professionals in this study. One GP stressed that limited consult time challenges doctors to recommend and tailor physical activity advice and referrals:

“As GPs, we get really busy. We don’t always have time to talk about lifestyle as much as we should, and sometimes, we’ll mention exercise and diet as 3 words in the whole consult, and that’s it. Sometimes, we don’t have time to delve into it further” (P8, 38-year-old female, GP).

Physical activity participation was recommended; however, referring to physical activity programs is not always a priority. While the benefits of physical activity are acknowledged for a range of health conditions, some health professionals commented that it is not always a treatment priority. Subsequently, participation is encouraged by these professionals but may not lead to an exercise referral:

“There’s more pressing priorities that we need to deal with, and then it might be a throwaway comment that we’ll mention at the end of the consultation” (P8, 38-year-old female, GP).

“There’s obviously a huge evidence base on physical activity and mental health, but I don’t want to recommend exercise for the sake of it, if it doesn’t fit in the treatment plan” (P3, 26-year-old female, clinical psychologist).

Lack of knowledge about physical activity programs. A lack of knowledge about the available physical activity programs was the most prominent barrier to referral. All participants had knowledge of the benefits of physical activity and exercise but felt underprepared to locate appropriate physical activity services to refer patients to despite expressing willingness to learn more about options:

“A lot of health professionals, whether they’re medical, allied health, don’t have sufficient knowledge of the schemes themselves. We have that clear understanding of why exercise is beneficial, but then how does that manifest in day-to-day life?” (P5, 32-year-old female, clinical psychologist).

It arose that health professionals often are given many pamphlets by EPs on physical activity services, but this does not translate into knowing about the services, and rather, they would prefer to learn about options in an interactive, participatory way.

“We get swarmed with so many brochures, and there are so many programs around, but we forget what’s out there, so having that face-to-face communication does make a difference like improving awareness for sure” (P2, 39-year-old female, GP).

“Is it possible for me to try out one of the classes first to see what it’s like before I refer patients?” (P8, 38-year-old female, GP).

Participants had a multitude of other suggestions to increase health professionals’ knowledge of referral programs:

“I would recommend utilizing social media. It’s one of the most powerful tools that we have at the moment. All ages and abilities have access to social media, also reaching out to the local GP practices, putting as much advertising as possible in their foyer areas” (P4, 23-year-old female, accredited exercise physiologist).

“Professional development (PD) that are relevant to the profession that combine physical activity, so you can reaffirm how big a role it can play in supporting clients” (P5, 32-year-old female, clinical psychologist).

“If you have patient success stories where you could say the patient had diabetes with a HbA1c of this, and with exercise physiology, we were able to achieve this outcome. Show real outcomes in a really defined sense. That might help because doctors do think scientifically. We have to do Webinars for our continued professional development, and those are usually given by specialists, so if you could try and like tack on like with a cardiologist or an endocrinologist at the like beginning or end for 10–15 min, that would be a good way to capture GPs” (P8, 38-year-old female, GP).

“If there’s something that could be added on to our medical director system, and it is just a click of a button” (P6, 57-year-old female, GP).

A physiotherapist also added that a cultural shift would be beneficial, starting from education of health professionals during undergraduate university:

“Any professional in general, I think I’ve seen success when the EPs push it with the clinics and make themselves known. I think they just need to know their referral source. I think it would probably help more at, I guess, grassroots level if EP was a more known during our degree. Often, we have students that were EPs in the past” (P7, 33-year-old male, physiotherapist).

Facilitators to Recommending Physical Activity and ERSs

Personal and patient experience of physical activity benefits and exercise services increased willingness to refer. Participants who were active themselves tended to advocate for exercise referrals:

“I have used them personally, and I’ve had really good feedback from patients who have used them” (P6, 57-year-old female, GP).

“They all report positively. The only thing, we have to maintain it, so they’ve had a positive experience, and now it’s about maintaining that” (P5, 32-year-old female, clinical psychologist).

However, 1 GP shared that sometimes patient feedback can be both positive and negative:

“The feedback is mixed, ‘I didn’t have the time. Life’s too busy, or there’s just too much other stuff going on,’ so they might not have actually gone” (P2, 39-year-old female, GP).

Good physical activity literacy about knowledge of potential benefits for patients. Most (n = 5) health care professionals were able to correctly report the Australian physical activity guidelines, and all had extensive knowledge of the relationship between physical activity, exercise, and mental and physical health:

“The exercise guidelines being active on most days of the week, if not every, up to 30 min of moderate intensity, aerobic training, or vigorous intensity, and then in addition to that, 2 or more resistance, training, or strength sessions on nonconsecutive days per week, depending on the individual as well some potential flexibility, training, mobility training” (P4, 23-year-old female, accredited exercise physiologist).

“I recommend it for all clients regardless because of the improvement for across your whole being—mental, social, emotional. I make bigger emphasis if the client presents with a certain presentation like depression or anxiety. Mostly depression is the biggest one I recommend it for” (P5, 32-year-old female, clinical psychologist).

Simple referral process to free exercise with social group options were preferrable. Health care professionals discussed that they recommended certain ERSs more than others if they were simple to refer to or sign-up to, easy and flexible for patients to attend sessions, affordable, and offered group or social options:

“If it’s appropriate for their lifestyle, financially suitable for them, and if it’s been their reason of referral to me” (P5, 32-year-old female, clinical psychologist).

“I choose [LLGA] because of the social component as well. It’s out in the community. It’s affordable. In our local health district, there’s a lot of low socioeconomic status, and a lot of people that we might see may not be able to afford to go to a gym or a trainer, whereas the fact that the classes are free and it’s community based, they offer the virtual options as well, so there’s the flexibility for people that may not feel comfortable going in person. The benefit is that everyone’s welcome, and people can choose to go when they wish. Also, people said it was fun” (P1, 39-year-old male, clinical psychologist).

“Some patients who might be eligible for a GP care plan, they may be able to then access an [accredited] exercise physiologist with a subsidized cost, so that that would influence my—like I’m more likely to bring it up to a patient if I know they are eligible for a care plan” (P8, 38-year-old female, GP).

DISCUSSION

The aim of this study was to explore the barriers and facilitators experienced by health professionals in the promotion of physical activity programs, particularly focused on ERSs. Results provide insight into the suggested qualities of programs and ERSs needed to increase promotion by health care professionals, and we discuss recommendations for schemes to improve uptake and reach. These strategies focus on increasing knowledge for health care professionals about ERSs and reducing the gap between knowledge and action by increasing ease and instances of referral.

Some barriers to promoting ERSs were nonmodifiable, including short consult times and competing priorities for the professionals to address. However, after these interviews were conducted, the Australian Medicare system introduced longer GP consult times for patients with chronic conditions that may help alleviate barriers (35). Regardless, this finding may be applicable to other contexts, as simplifying the referral process to exercise providers may ease the administrative burden on health care professionals and increase the likelihood of a referral being made. For example, LLGA offers self-referral, whereby patients can easily refer themselves for online registration. Overall, health care professionals demonstrated foundational knowledge of the physical activity guidelines and the health benefits of physical activity; however, knowledge of specific services and the required referral process was lacking.

Although our study was conducted in New South Wales, Australia, the findings may be relevant to other Australian states or countries that use ERSs. A mixed-methods study representing 207 GPs across Australia had similar findings, with 36% of the sample indicating that knowledge on referral pathways was lacking and 22% agreeing that inadequate consult time was a barrier to physical activity referrals (36). However, the most common barrier for 50% of GPs in this study, which did not arise in our study, was scarcity of referral pathways, which indicates they may vary between states (36). Key recommendations supported by GPs aligned with our recommendations, including improved visibility of EPs and an overview of available referral pathways (36). Internationally, our findings are consistent with research from primary care settings in other countries, including the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Uptake and use of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales was limited similarly by lack of consult time, lack of scheme awareness, and a complicated and disjointed referral system (37). Additional to our findings, the participants of this study and another in the Netherlands perceived a barrier to be a lack of feedback from the ERS provider about referred clients’ attendance or progress (37,38). The need to address short consult times and the impact on ERSs has also been identified (37,39). Along with the positive changes to consult duration options (35), this further supports the universal need for simple referral processes disseminated to health care professionals through improved and simplified communication.

Facilitators of exercise referrals in this study were encompassed in the overarching theme “tailored physical activity and exercise approach determined in collaboration with patients.” Participants expressed factors such as a patient health, financial situation, and location which all contributed to referral decisions. Evidence supports that referrers favor referral to exercise services that were affordable, local to the patient, and known as an option to health care professionals (38).

Informed by the results, ways to address knowledge and training are suggested. Both referrers and patients need ease of referral and knowledge of services for increased exercise referral uptake and use. Potential strategies for services to consider include setting up referral through medical director systems to easily show options in each area. Another option is allowing patient self-referral and registration using a Quick Response (QR) code while waiting in medical reception areas, easing the burden on health care professionals. Knowledge of exercise services and the referral processes could be improved using interactive strategies such as Come and Try exercise classes and continued professional development (CPD) events that link to ERSs to provide CPD points as incentive for professionals to attend.

Limitations

Sample size was based on data adequacy; however, regardless, the sample size was small, and participants were recruited through an existing program LLGA. The sample (32) may therefore have been biased toward professionals who are already interested in physical activity and open to promoting ERSs, despite some reporting they had not previously referred to one. Participants were asked about personal physical activity; however, exploring exercise history in more depth could have helped explore the sample bias. Participant checking of transcripts was not used due to resources. Also, the sample also discussed ERSs in the context of the Australian health care system, which may therefore not be transferable to other settings.

CONCLUSION

This study was a qualitative investigation into the barriers and facilitators for Australian health care professionals to promoting ERSs. The interdisciplinary approach is novel and clearly showed that, regardless of profession, many views on barriers and facilitators to physical activity programs and ERSs were universal. The findings around the Australian context offer transferrable recommendations to ERSs worldwide. Overall, participants had good physical activity knowledge and aimed to find a tailored physical activity approach for their patients. A simple sign-up process, social group options, and positive feedback from patients was preferred. Physical activity participation was often recommended; although, sometimes, recommendation to specific programs was limited by consult duration and lack of knowledge about options.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank LLGA, a registered health promotion charity, for funding this project and for helping to recruit for this study.

REFERENCES

  • 1.
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW).
    Chronic disease
    2021. Accessed September 12, 2023. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/health-conditions-disability-deaths/chronic-disease/overview
  • 2.
    Ding D, Andrea Ramirez V, Adrian EB, Ulf E, Lee IM, Gregory H, Peter TK, Rodrigo R, Michael P. Towards better evidence-informed global action: lessons learnt from the Lancet series and recent developments in physical activity and public health. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(
    8
    ):462. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2019-101001
  • 3.
    Gebreslassie M, Sampaio F, Nystrand C, Ssegonja R, Feldman I. Economic evaluations of public health interventions for physical activity and healthy diet: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2020;136:106100. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106100
  • 4.
    Caspersen C, Powell K, Christenson G. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(
    2
    ):126.
  • 5.
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian burden of disease study: impact and causes of illness and death in Australia 2015
    .
    Canberra
    :
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
    ; 2019.
  • 6.
    Australian Government Department of Health. Chronic disease management—individual allied health services under Medicare—provider information 2014. Accessed September 12, 2023. https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing. nsf/Content/health-medicare-health_pro-gp-pdf-allied-cnt.htm
  • 7.
    McHale S, Pearsons A, Neubeck L, Hanson CL. Green health partnerships in Scotland; pathways for social prescribing and physical activity referral. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(
    18
    ):6832. doi:10.3390/ijerph17186832
  • 8.
    Gates AB, Kerry R, Moffatt F, Ritchie IK, Meakins A, Thornton JS, Rosenbaum S, Taylor A. Movement for movement: exercise as everybody’s business? Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(
    10
    ):7678. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096857
  • 9.
    Craike M, Britt H, Parker A, Harrison C. General practitioner referrals to exercise physiologists during routine practice: a prospective study. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22(
    4
    ):47883. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2018.10.005
  • 10.
    Cant RP, Foster MM. Investing in big ideas: utilisation and cost of Medicare Allied Health services in Australia under the Chronic Disease Management initiative in primary care. Australian Health Review. 2011;35(
    4
    ):46874. doi:10.1071/AH10938
  • 11.
    Cheema B, Robergs R, Askew C. Exercise physiologists emerge as allied healthcare professionals in the era of non-communicable disease pandemics: a report from Australia, 2006–2012. Sports Med. 2014;44(
    7
    ):86977. doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0173-y
  • 12.
    Britt H, Miller GC, Henderson J, Bayram C, Harrison C, Valenti L, Wong C, Gordon J, Pollack AJ, Pan Y.
    General practice activity in Australia 2014–15
    .
    Sydney
    :
    Sydney University Press
    ; 2015.
  • 13.
    The Department of Health. Fact sheet: primary health care. 2018. Accessed September 12, 2023. https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/Fact-Sheet-Primary-Health-Care
  • 14.
    Orrow G, Kinmonth A-L, Sanderson S, Sutton S. Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2012;344:e1389. doi:10.1136/bmj.e1389
  • 15.
    Vijay G, Wilson EC, Suhrcke M, Hardeman W, Sutton S. Are brief interventions to increase physical activity cost-effective? A systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(
    7
    ):40817. Epub 20151005. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-094655
  • 16.
    Nana KA, Joanne L, Julia F-R. Is brief advice in primary care a cost-effective way to promote physical activity? Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(
    3
    ):202. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-092897
  • 17.
    Drinkwater C, Wildman J, Moffatt S. Social prescribing. BMJ. 2019;364:I1285. doi:10.1136/bmj.l1285
  • 18.
    Craike M, Klepac Pogrmilovic B, Calder R.
    Supporting physical activity promotion in primary health care
    .
    Melbourne
    :
    Mitchell Institute, Victoria University
    ; 2020.
  • 19.
    Rowley N, Mann S, Steele J, Horton E, Jimenez A. The effects of exercise referral schemes in the United Kingdom in those with cardiovascular, mental health, and musculoskeletal disorders: a preliminary systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(
    1
    ):949. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5868-9
  • 20.
    Craike M, Wiesner G, Enticott J, Bennie JA, Biddle SJ. Equity of a government subsidised exercise referral scheme: a population study. Social Science & Medicine. 2018;216:205. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.023
  • 21.
    Sanchez A, Bully P, Martinez C, Grandes G. Effectiveness of physical activity promotion interventions in primary care: a review of reviews. Prev Med. 2015;76:S5667.
  • 22.
    Fortier MS, Hogg W, O’Sullivan TL, Blanchard C, Sigal RJ, Reid RD, Boulay P, Doucet É, Bisson É, Beaulac J. Impact of integrating a physical activity counsellor into the primary health care team: physical activity and health outcomes of the Physical Activity Counselling randomized controlled trial. Appl Physiol, Nutr, Metab. 2011;36(
    4
    ):50314. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.09.012
  • 23.
    Hardcastle S, Blake N, Hagger MS. The effectiveness of a motivational interviewing primary-care based intervention on physical activity and predictors of change in a disadvantaged community. J Behav Med. 2012;35:31833. doi:10.1007/s10865-012-9417-1
  • 24.
    McKeon G, Mastrogiovanni C, Teychenne M, Rosenbaum S. Barriers and facilitators to participating in an exercise referral scheme among women living in a low socioeconomic area in Australia: a qualitative investigation using the COM-B and theoretical domains framework. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(
    19
    ). doi:10.3390/ijerph191912312
  • 25.
    Mino E, Hanson CL, Naber I, Weissenfels A, McHale S, Saftig J, Klamroth S, Gelius P, Abu-Omar K, Whiting S, Wickramasinghe K, Galea G, Pfeifer K, Geidl W. A systematic review and narrative synthesis of physical activity referral schemes’ components. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023;20(
    1
    ):140. doi:10.1186/s12966-023-01518-x
  • 26.
    Tomlinson-Perez S, Machaczek KK, Firth J, Pollard N, Meda G, Keddie E, Goyder E. Evaluation of the uptake, retention and effectiveness of exercise referral schemes for the management of mental health conditions in primary care: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(
    1
    ):117. doi:10.1186/s12889-022-12638-7
  • 27.
    Williams NH, Hendry M, France B, Lewis R, Wilkinson C. Effectiveness of exercise-referral schemes to promote physical activity in adults: systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(
    545
    ):97986. doi:10.3399/096016407782604866
  • 28.
    O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(
    9
    ):124551. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
  • 29.
    Bradshaw C, Atkinson S, Doody O. Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research. 2017;4:2333393617742282. doi:10.1177/2333393617742282
  • 30.
    Mackenzie N, Knipe S. Research dilemmas: paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues in Educational Research. 2006;16(
    2
    ):193205. https://www.iier.org.au/iier16/mackenzie.html
  • 31.
    Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research. 2016;26(
    13
    ):175360. doi:10.1177/1049732315617444
  • 32.
    Braun V, Clarke V. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. 2021;13(
    2
    ):20116. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
  • 33.
    Clarke V, Braun V, Hayfield N.
    Thematic analysis
    . In: Smith JA. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods.
    Thousand Oaks, CA
    :
    Sage Publications
    ; 2015:22248.
  • 34.
    Smith B, McGannon KR. Developing rigor in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2018;11(
    1
    ):10121. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357
  • 35.
    Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. Introduction of MBS Level E long consultations of 60 minutes or more 2023. Accessed September 12, 2023. https://www.mbsonline.gov.au/internet/mbsonline/publishing.nsf/Content/8D8078B92CB053C5CA258A3F0004BF6E/$File/PDF%20Vers%20-%20Introduction%20of%20MBS%20Level%20E%20long%20consultations%20of%2060%20minutes%20or%20more%20-%20factsheet.pdf
  • 36.
    Albert FA, Malau-Aduli AEO, Crowe MJ, Malau-Aduli BS. Optimising care coordination strategies for physical activity referral scheme patients by Australian health professionals. PLoS One. 2022;17(
    7
    ):e0270408. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0270408
  • 37.
    Morgan K, Lewis J, Hawkins J, Moore G. From a research trial to routine practice: stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of referrals to the National Exercise Referral Scheme (NERS) in Wales. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(
    1
    ):1232. doi:10.1186/s12913-021-07266-7
  • 38.
    Leemrijse CJ, de Bakker DH, Ooms L, Veenhof C. Collaboration of general practitioners and exercise providers in promotion of physical activity a written survey among general practitioners. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(
    1
    ):96. doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0316-8
  • 39.
    Graham RC, Dugdill L, Cable NT. Health professionals’ perspectives in exercise referral: implications for the referral process. Ergonomics. 2005;48(
    11–14
    ):141122. doi:10.1080/00140130500101064
Copyright: Copyright © 2025 Clinical Exercise Physiology Association 2025
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.

Thematic analysis structure dichotomized into health care professional barriers and facilitators to promoting exercise referral schemes (ERSs).


Contributor Notes

Address for correspondence: Chiara Mastrogiovanni, MSc, ESSAM AEP, Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia; +614 5165 2163; e-mail: c.mastrogiovanni@unsw.edu.au.

Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. This project was funded by Live Life Get Active. The funders exclusively contributed to the recruitment phase, however, were not involved in the conduct of the study.

  • Download PDF